Posted on 12/9:

Mourinho has come up with his ten commandments to beat Barca, but any list can’t beat the culture of Barca. This game does worry me for Barca, because they just don’t seem to be in the same form of previous years. That is not to say the extra motivation from playing Real Madrid may be the spark to pull them together… let’s hope and pray.

Barcelona’s commandments:

1) play as a team (always!) - Another different lineup after 26 official games. Guardiola still hasn’t repeated the same starting eleven this season. The starting line-up for the Clasico was brand new. TRUST in each other and the manager.

2) keep possession (frustrate Madrid) – Barça had 67.5% ball possession. Once again, Guardiola’s players had the ball much more than their eternal rivals.

3) have fun with the ball (frustrate Madrid) – Of the 14 players who played in the Clasico for Barça, 9 came up through the youth ranks: Valdes, Puyol, Pique, Busquets, Xavi, Iniesta, Cesc, Messi and Pedro. Of the 14 used by Madrid, only one, Casillas. Barca play with joy, RM play with the weight of the world on their shoulders. After the quick Benzema goal in first minute… Mourinho didn’t even smile.

Mourinho’s 10 commandments for defeating Barca:
1. Don’t give up a goal. Or at least not in the first half.  – whoops!

2. Let the fans make the Bernabeu Stadium hell for Barca. – RM fans did a pretty good job, but after the goal they showed the same lack of belief as the players.

3. Don’t worry about the referee. But be careful about picking up cards. – Regeree was good and not a repeat of last year, thank god!

4. Take advantage of Real’s aerial superiority. – they missed here.

5. Don’t lose sight of the ball for an instant. – gotta watch your marks too, don’t get caught ball watching! Alexis and Messi showed them how that can hurt.

6. Shut down the space Barca players have and pass on the marking. – Early on RM did a really good job here. Barca played a lot in their half.

7. Intensity, Pressure, Verticality and lots of rhythm. – difficult to get rhythm when you don’t have the ball.

8. Work hard to tire out Barca. – Can’t tire out Barca, imposible!

9. Concentration and coordination of movements. – just not there yet to overcome the culture of Barca… Barca players don’t have to think because the way they move has become a part of their life… viva La Masia!

10. Believe in yourself. Don’t be anxious. – They became anxious, immediately after the first goal.

Have you seen a recent FC Barcelona game? After a goal their is euphoria from the players… the more magical the goal, the more congratulatory the celebration. Everyone appreciates FC Barcelona’s technical play, but they really love the creativity they show to break down defenses. The formula is quite simple:

1. Technique is paramount – you’ve got to have belief in yourself and your teammates to take the risks that lead to creativity – you only get that by having sound technical ability.
2. Culture of Support – if your teammates and coaches recognize and appreciate your attempts at creativity, whether they were successful or not, the creative machine is fueled with a constant stream of renewable energy.
   1. Barcelona probably has 40+ buildups each game to the goal and often they only result in 1 or 2 goals… not a good ratio, so consistency of belief and support is

Creativity comes from having tremendous skill and having the freedom to make mistakes. If you are not in an environment that is supportive, you won’t take risks. How many players worry about making mistakes on the field because the coach or parents freak out about losing the ball? That’s rhetorical… too many. Building a level of trust with your players takes time and the older they are, it takes seasons. Why? Because they need to unlearn the fear of making mistakes. Only then can we unlock that creativity, that joy and the passion.

For those that need a little Ivory Tower support, below is a blurb from The Harvard Business Review blog that addresses creativity in companies. Everyone is chasing the creative and the innovative, but the powers that be don’t reward creativity… they punish the unproductive, and reward the robotic… so what type of player are you going to get with that approach.

Tony Schwartz

Tony Schwartz is the president and CEO of The Energy Project and the author of Be Excellent at Anything.

Myth #3: Creativity is genetically inherited, and it’s impossible to teach.

In a global economy characterized by unprecedented competitiveness and constant change, nearly every CEO hungers for ways to drive more innovation. Unfortunately, most CEOs don’t think of themselves as creative, and they share with the rest of us a deeply ingrained belief that creativity is mostly inborn and magical.

Ironically, researchers have developed a surprising degree of consensus about the stages of creativity and how to approach them. Our educational system and most company cultures favor reward the rational, analytic, deductive left hemisphere thinking. We pay scant attention to intentionally cultivating the more visual, intuitive, big picture capacities of the right hemisphere.

As it turns out, the creative process moves back and forth between left and right hemisphere dominance. Creativity is actually about using the whole brain more flexibly. This process unfolds in a far more systematic — and teachable — way than we ordinarily imagine. People can quickly learn to access the hemisphere of the brain that serves them best at each stage of the creative process — and to generate truly original ideas.

Each one of these coaches are making drastic mistakes and hurting the most important muscle of our young players, THEIR BRAINS. The damage to self-confidence and self-awareness can be extremely damaging to the player in the short term and eventually kill the passion that we so much want to see in our kids as they get into their most difficult teen years.

Parents and coaches alike can use the information below to help manage their “feedback” approach. Try it and see what the immediate effects are and once you see how well it works immediately, make it part of every interaction you have with your children and players. Then go get Mind Set, by Carol Dweck and begin to understand how important words are to affecting those little people we are molding.

The below is taken from MindSet Works:

Rule #1: When things go wrong, keep it real.  It’s not easy to tell a child that they screwed up, and knowing this may cause anxiety, disappointment or embarrassment.  But don’t make the mistake of protecting a child’s feelings at the expense of telling them what they truly need to hear.  Remember that without honest feedback, kids can’t possibly figure out what to do differently next time.

Also, don’t take away a child’s sense of responsibility for what went wrong (assuming he or she is in fact to blame), just because you don’t want to be “hard” on them.  Letting children off the hook for their own mistakes, telling them that they “tried their best” when it’s clear that they didn’t, may leave kids feeling powerless to improve.

Rule #2: When things go wrong, fight self-doubt.  Children need to believe that success is within reach, no matter what mistakes they have made in the past.  To do this,

• Be specific.   What needs improvement, and what exactly can be done to improve?

• Emphasize actions that they have the power to change. Talk about aspects of performance that are under their control, like the time and effort that were put into a practicing, or the study method which was used.

• Avoid praising effort when it didn’t pay off. Many parents try to console their child by saying things like “Well honey, you didn’t do very well, but you worked hard and really tried your best.”  Why does anyone think that this is comforting?  For the record – it’s not.  (Unless, of course, it was a no-win situation from the start).

Studies show that, after a failure, being complimented for “effort” not only makes kids feel stupid, it also leaves them feeling like they can’t improve.  In these instances, it’s really best to stick to purely informational feedback – if effort isn’t the problem, help them figure out what is.

Rule #3: When things go right, avoid praising ability.  I know we all like to hear how smart and talented we are, and so naturally we assume that it’s what kids want to hear too.  Of course they do.  But it’s not what they need to hear to stay motivated.

Studies conducted by Carol Dweck and her colleagues show that when children are praised for having high ability, it leaves them more vulnerable to self-doubt when they are faced with a challenge later.  If being successful means that a child is “smart,” then they’re likely to conclude that they aren’t smart when having a harder time.

Make sure that you also praise aspects of your child’s performance that were under their control.  Talk about a creative approach, careful planning, persistence and effort, and a positive attitude.  Praise actions, not just abilities. That way, when your child runs into trouble later on, they’ll remember what helped them to succeed in the past and put that knowledge to good use.

Sound advice from a great organization, now go get that book (Mind Set) and get better at molding your children and/or your players.

By Dev K. Mishra, M.D., President, Sideline Sports Doc

To recap: I don’t think there’s any better playing surface than a well-maintained grass field, but I’d prefer one of the newer varieties of turf fields over a poorly-maintained grass field any day.  Some people have also suggested that the interaction between the athlete’s shoe and the playing surface can have some effect on injury rates.  It turns out that this is an issue that’s been studied pretty extensively in the scientific literature for older artificial surfaces like AstroTurf®, and there’s some good information relating to the newer surfaces that use soft rubber infill like FieldTurf® too.

There are two competing issues at work here, and both come down to friction.  From a performance perspective athletes like a lot of friction between their shoe/cleat and the playing surface- it results in what we’d commonly call “traction”.  A lot of traction allows them to start and stop very quickly and also to turn on a dime.  As you can imagine, if you’re slipping (less friction) it will have a negative effect on your quickness and cutting ability.  But from a medical standpoint friction can lead to injury.  Injuries to the ankle, knee, and hip often are the result of forces created on the joints when the foot stays planted firmly on the playing surface and the body goes another way.  The engineering term for this is a “rotational moment” and the higher the rotational moment the greater is the potential for injury.

The main points they found were that for the field surface, the infill-type artificial turf surfaces all had higher rotational traction values than grass, regardless of shoe type.  For the shoe types they found no differences in rotational torques for the 7-stud, 12-stud, hybrid, or blade types; but the turf shoes had significantly less rotational torque than any of the other cleat types.

So what can I recommend based upon the studies I’ve looked at (there are many more than just the one above)?  Remember that my viewpoint for this post is biased towards player safety, and as discussed above this could affect performance.

• If you’re playing on turf the data would indicate that a turf shoe could very well be the “safest” type of shoe, but you might find that you slip a bit too much in these.  If possible I’d recommend that you test a turf shoe out on your field.  If it allows you to perform the way you’d like I’d recommend that you wear it.  If the turf shoe causes too much slipping your next choice should likely be a firm ground cleat.
• If you’re playing on grass the data doesn’t show a difference in traction amongst cleat types. In spite of that I wouldn’t ever recommend a soft ground cleat on firm grass.
• The study also shows that the type of upper material will affect the rotational traction too, for very complex reasons.  A stiff non-yielding upper (like a hard synthetic material) might produce higher rotational traction.  So if possible I would recommend a soft leather upper material.

You can read the whole article HERE

Great attributes to have, but really? No mention of skill, technical ability, counter-attacks, build up from the back, great off the ball movement, intelligent play, or anything else that might think they played soccer games. You could probably replace the word soccer and the team names and scoreline and think you were reading an article about American Football, with pads and helmets.

I’m not saying that these players have no skill; I didn’t watch the games. I would only like to stress that until the people watching and influencing the game from the sidelines (the ones writing the articles) start to appreciate the more intricate side of the game, we will only get players that are aggressive, athletic and relentless. The rest of the world will continue to win the games, but we’ll sure be able to win the fight in the alley.

The XXX team won its first tournament title of the season, going undefeated in five games to win the 2011 Soccer Showcase over weekend.

XXX started off by facing a determined OOO team and prevailed 1-0 behind a solid defense and a relentless attack.

Next up for XXX was a very fast Blue team, a matchup which neither team could dominate as reflected by their 0-0 draw.

Those results set up a final group game against FC Black, with the winner advancing to the playoffs. XXX struck first and looked to take their lead into halftime when FC Black struck with the equalizer. XXX pushed forward in the second half, netting a goal to secure a 2-1 win and their spot in the semi-finals.

The playoff opponent was SC Academy, an aggressive and speedy team, with a lot of toughness. XXX again relied on its standout defense to keep a clean sheet and a 2-0 win.

Unfortunately, that victory came with a loss, as the XXX goal-keeper broke her finger in the game and was ruled out for the rest of the tournament.

Already shorthanded, the XXX girls regrouped to face Premier, the number-two team in State X, in the finals. The game was scrappy from the start, with tough tackles all around as both teams were wary of conceding the first goal.

XXX struck first on a free kick from 25 yards out. XXX  surrendered that lead midway through the second half, when Premier capitalized from the mark after one of its players was fouled in the XXX penalty area.

Faced with the daunting prospect of overtime and given its shorthanded situation on the bench, XXX pressed forward and was rewarded with another free kick just outside the Premier penalty area, which again found the back of the net.

Despite furious pressure from their opponent, the XXX girls defended tenaciously, until the final whistle blew.

XXX was crowned Champions in and that win propelled XXX to a Top-50 national ranking, the highest mark ever achieved by a team in the club.

 

The names have been changed, because my goal isn’t to embarrass anyone or slight the teams involved, but to point out that soccer isn’t just a game of kicking the other team while trying to kick the ball.

Player Development: Accountable for What? And to Who?

by Gary Kleiban on July 10, 2011

I don’t know if real accountability for player development is possible.

What are the metrics?

• Is it how many players you place in college?
• Is it the number that get called to youth national teams?
• Is it the number of professionals you’ve touched while they were amateur?

Tyler Dennis July 11, 2011 at 10:04 am

Gary Kleiban July 12, 2011 at 4:58 pm

I’m with you Tyler. I think the target must be the moon and the stars.

Now, here’s a problem;
If we consider the vast majority of American MLS players “not developed”, then were their respective youth coaches “good”.

For instance, was the coach who had a big influence with Altidore, Wynne, Casey, et al an excellent developer of players?

Reply

Tyler Dennis July 12, 2011 at 9:44 pm

I would say they weren’t good coaches. If those players were able to make it to the professional level/National team without their “special” physical attributes, I’d say yes.

Altidore is 6’1?, Conor Casey 6’2?, Marvell Wynne is 5’9? but possesses freakish speed. Those guys still aren’t good enough to be special even with those attributes. When it’s easy for a coach to pick a player based on their physical attributes, and they don’t help that player become a phenom then they aren’t good. Sorry, but if Marvell Wynne had a great coach, he’d be playing left back for Barcelona or Chelsea. Altidore scored only 1 goal in 28 appearances for Hull City in the EPL… nope, not good enough.

We don’t have those coaches. I think there are very few coaches in the American system that would pass up size or speed for a skillful player. Remember, they’ve got to get the kids into college so that they can market their programs… and Colleges want to win… athletes win because its a game of multiple subs and athleticism.

It is hard to get kids to play attractive soccer. It takes a lot of time and attention to detail. It also takes intensity at practice to create an environment that is game like. I just don’t see coaches willing to require that intensity, nor do they pay enough attention to detail to get the kids better. They are too afraid to lose the kids and the parents or they just don’t know what it takes to be damn good.

I still see too many coaches, with credentials galore, playing kickball, bypassing the midfield, not playing out of the back, having a defender take the goal kick, looking for big strong forwards…

So, my answer to your question about the coach of those guys is no, he wasn’t good… because those players had physical attributes that should have given them a huge advantage in the world of soccer and they aren’t in the top 200 in the world.

Reply

BillR July 13, 2011 at 6:52 am

Tyler,

Excellent post, I think you’ve hit the nail on the proverbial head!

My only quibble is with your comment about Wynne, I don’t think he has the level of concentration or creative ability to step up to a World class level. I think the mental capacity to concentrate for 90+ minutes is underestimated by people looking at players (or the game in general). Soccer may place a greater toll on concentration/mental strength than almost any other sport (certainly team sport). No time outs, constant pressure, and a single lapse can cost you the game.

Wynne has World class physically to be sure, but the mental side of the game appears to be well short of the mark. His skill level was probably stunted by his ability to overpower everyone as a youth player.

Bill

Reply

Tyler Dennis July 13, 2011 at 8:44 am

Bill,

I agree with you about the mental capacity being very important. I think that mental capacity is developed with an intense practice. If the practice is lackadaisical, then the player’s mind just isn’t challenged. We have to make them think while they are in practice, call them out on it when they don’t and do our best, as coaches, to get the kids to keep pushing the limits of both their physical and mental game. A good coach is one that inspires and pushes a player to be what they can be and doesn’t let them just be what they are.

The soccer was great to watch and fun for the kids. We cheered on Puebla because DeMarcus Beasley (#11) plays for them now. He made a huge impact and scored the lone goal from a header on an early cross to the far post… he also created a penalty kick opportunity by slicing and dicing his way into the box early in the game, but the kick taker shanked the opportunity. The game was pretty slow, with very little quick movement and accurate one touch passing. The day was warm, but both teams didn’t play the most inspired soccer. I think Puebla gave a better effort and rightfully came out on top.

The second game was the Xolos, newly promoted to the Primera division, against San Luis. A Xoloscuintles is a dog and looks like this guy, but favors 4 legs over 2.

The Xolos have 4 fan clubs on each side of the field, but the biggest are about 800 strong on the southern end. Right before the game they let out this plume of smoke. They didn’t stop dancing (bouncing) the whole game and during the penalty kicks at the end they all took off their shirts. The Xolos are fun to watch and they played a fun brand of soccer. They created many opportunities and the wing play was great. The back and midfielder on the left side were dribbling machines and one of the center halves was phenomenal on the ball. The defense gave up an early goal out of laziness… didn’t track a runner because they thought he was offside. So, the game ended in penalty kicks and the Xolos lost – which may have been a blessing. When the Xolos scored earlier in the game, cups and beer and anything else in hand was thrown, so I’d hate to see what the fans do with a win.

All in all we had a great time and got to watch some fun soccer, as you can see this is at the beginning of the day when the kids could still smile

Joining the impromptu parade!

I was in Mexico with the family for the Gold Cup final, so me, my wife, brother-in-law and my father-in-law went to a restaurant to watch the game. I, of course, was the only one supporting the U.S., so after the first two goals the waiters weren’t as friendly – my sangria seemed like it had less good stuff, but after the game they were all smiles.

I’m glad that Mexico won because it created a great atmosphere, an atmosphere the kids would never experience in the States. My wife and I left the restaurant immediately and got the kids. We drove town to the main street, bought some Mexican flags, turned up the radio and let the kids hang out of our sunroof to celebrate with the 100s of cars and couple of thousand fans. I’m really glad the kids got to experience the love of the sport from so many passionate fans, an experience that just wouldn’t happen in the U.S. Does it hurt that they were yelling Mexico!, Mexico!, a little, but hey, they are half Mexican and so get to have best of both worlds.